FARAAN: Political pundits and observers believe that the intensification of the security crisis in Sudan and the departure of foreign nationals from the country is a warning signal to unify the result of military conflicts; a situation that has fueled the concerns of the occupying regime regarding the normalization process with Khartoum authorities.
Commentary:
Political experts pointed out: “Sudan is the scene of civil war and bloodshed due to the insistence of the army and militias known as the Rapid Reaction Forces on the continuation of the war for power. This war will not end with the establishment of the army’s control over some areas; because the Rapid Reaction forces are equally claiming to gain power.
Political researchers pointed out that due to the insistence of both sides on gaining power and removing civilians, Sudan will be the scene of bloody disasters in the near future. On the other hand, according to the agreement between the political parties including the “Freedom and Change” forces and the military council, the civilian government should have been formed in 2019.
According to these experts, Sudan has buckled under the burden of the economic, political and financial crisis at all levels, so it is time to hand over power to the civilians according to the 2019 agreement, so that through this solution, Sudan will leave the trusteeship and stop the bloodshed.
On the other hand, experts on regional issues state that the obvious characteristic of the current military conflict in Sudan is the conflict between the Western colonial project and the national independence project that started 4 years ago.
According to the same sources, the aim of the Western project is to dominate Sudan and use it to secure its own interests. Emphasizing that the regional partners are directly responsible for monitoring the implementation of the Western project against Sudan, this political expert noted: “One of the goals of this project is to remove Arabic as the official language in the country, as well as to remove curricula related to national independence and social and historical values, and at the head of them is the removal of the Palestinian issue, and this confirms the involvement of the Zionist regime in the ongoing conflicts in Sudan.
Political analysts say that the military conflict between the Sudanese army and the rapid reaction forces is a power struggle that feeds regional axes that compete for economic and strategic interests in the country.
These analysts say: “Military conflicts in Sudan postpone the process of normalization with the occupying regime, and this has prompted this regime to contact the rival parties in this country to establish a ceasefire.”
According to analysts, the evacuation of Arab and foreign nationals in Sudan and the departure of foreign nationals from the country is a warning signal for the general outcome of military conflicts, a situation that has fueled the concerns of the occupying regime regarding the normalization process with Khartoum authorities.
